Advertisement
Subscribe
- Home
- News
- Football 2026
- Sport
- Business
- Technology
- Health
- Culture
- Arts
- Travel
- Earth
- Audio
- Video
- Live
- Documentaries
Site search
News
Business
Technology
Culture
Arts
Travel
Earth
Audio
Video
Live
Documentaries
Advertisement
MPs seek veto over political ambassadors after Mandelson row
12 hours ago
Share
Save
Anna Lamche
PA Media
Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, has called for an "open and transparent process" for top diplomatic posts
Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee is seeking a veto on political appointments to top diplomatic posts following the controversy surrounding Lord Peter Mandelson's posting as UK ambassador to the US.
In a report published on Thursday, the committee said the due process taken in the appointment of Lord Mandelson "was being made up as it went along".
Questions have been asked about the process that led Lord Mandelson to become US ambassador in 2024 - only for him to be sacked last year over his ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The BBC understands Lord Mandelson's view is that he answered questions about his relationship with Epstein in the vetting process accurately.
In April, it emerged that Lord Mandelson was granted security clearance by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) - despite the fact concerns were raised about his appointment during the vetting process.
The peer underwent a process called Developed Vetting (DV) after his appointment was announced but before he formally took up the role in February 2025.
PA
Lord Mandelson was sacked last year over his links to Epstein
Sir Olly Robbins, the FCDO's top civil servant, was sacked by Sir Keir Starmer earlier this year over Lord Mandelson's security clearance.
Advertisement
After his removal, Sir Olly there had been an "atmosphere of pressure" and "constant chasing" from Number10 while checks were taking place.
In its recommendations, the report said that "no public appointments should be announced or made without the appropriate security clearance first being granted".
The report said documents published about the process suggested officials had taken a "dismissive view" about the need for Lord Mandelson to pass security clearance before taking up his post.
In its report, the committee said it had tasked itself with establishing "what constituted 'due process' when it came to political appointments".
After exploring what happened in Lord Mandelson's case, the report said, "the Committee has been left with every impression that this process was being made up as it went along".
"Lessons must be learned. There must be a proper process set out for political appointment[s], and this must include a scrutiny evidence session before the Foreign Affairs Committee," it reads.
The committee should have a veto "if the appointee is not felt to meet the standard required", the report said, adding compulsory pre-appointment hearings would "only apply to political appointees and not the Heads of Mission recruited from within the civil service".
It also said these candidates should face a compulsory evidence session prior to their appointment.
The report criticised "appalling" record-keeping by Number 10 and the FCDO and argued this might have been mitigated by a pre-appointment hearing with the committee.
"While Peter Mandelson may not have answered all our questions honestly, there would have been at the very least a public record of his statements, which we now do not have," the report added.
Other recommendations include:
- A formal process should be established for political appointments to ambassadorial roles
- The prime minister should always consult the foreign secretary and the head of diplomatic services before making a political appointment to an ambassadorial role
- Senior civil servants should be briefed on the findings of Sir Adrian Fulford, who is currently undertaking a review of National Security Vetting
- The FCDO must improve its record keeping process in relation to these appointments
The chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, the MP Dame Emily Thornberry, said there were "still unanswered questions as to how someone so clearly unfit was appointed British Ambassador to the United States".
She described Lord Mandelson's appointment as an "unmitigated disaster for the country" and called for measures to ensure an "open and transparent process" in the future.
"Processes were rushed or simply not followed. The usual checks and balances were not made. Vital security checks, integral to our national security, seemed to be viewed as a nuisance," she said.
Responding to a request for comment from the BBC, a government spokesperson said changes had already been made to the way the vetting process would apply for political appointees.
"The Prime Minister has commissioned an independent review of the National Security Vetting system, led by Sir Adrian Fulford, to ensure lessons are learned."
It is understood that Lord Mandelson considers the inquiry to have been led in a highly partisan and prejudicial way. It is understood he believes his appointment was not a disaster - with some notable successes.
Key evidence from sacked official at heart of Mandelson vetting row
Officials deliberately withheld Mandelson vetting result from me, Starmer says
Foreign Affairs Select Committee
Related
Starmer under pressure to recognise Palestinian statehood
Israel should turn water back on in Gaza - Cameron
Call to help resettle more Afghans who worked for UK
- Home
- News
- Football 2026
- Business
- Technology
- Health
- Culture
- Arts
- Travel
- Earth
- Sport
- Audio
- Video
- Live
- Documentaries
- Weather
- BBC Shop
- BritBox
BBC in other languages
The BBC is in multiple languages
Read the BBC In your own language
BBC News Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
BBC News Кыргыз Кызматы (Kyrgyz)
BBC News Русская служба (Russian)
Follow BBC on:
- Terms of Use
- Subscription Terms
- About the BBC
- Privacy Policy
- Cookies
- Accessibility Help
- Contact the BBC
- Advertise with us
- Do not share or sell my info
- BBC.com Help & FAQs
- Content Index
- Set Preferred Source
Copyright 2026 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.Read about our approach to external linking.