DailyGlimpse

This Conservative Is Not Afraid to Be a ‘Beautiful Loser’

Opinion
May 30, 2026 · 1:31 AM
This Conservative Is Not Afraid to Be a ‘Beautiful Loser’

Opinion | This Conservative Is Not Afraid to Be a ‘Beautiful Loser’ - The New York Times

Skip to contentSkip to site indexSearch & Section Navigation Section Navigation

Search

Subscribe for $1/weekLog in

Friday, May 29, 2026

Today’s Paper

Subscribe for $1/week

Opinion|This Conservative Is Not Afraid to Be a ‘Beautiful Loser’

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/29/opinion/trump-conservatism-republicans.html

  • Share full article

  • 8

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion

Supported by

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Guest Essay

This Conservative Is Not Afraid to Be a ‘Beautiful Loser’

May 29, 2026

Credit...Daniel Ribar for The New York Times

Audio 1

Listen · 13:23 min

  • Share full article

  • 8

By Elizabeth Corey and John Guida

Dr. Corey is a professor of political science at Baylor. Mr. Guida is an editor in Opinion.

See more of our coverage in your search results.Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda.Add The New York Times on Google Agrega The New York Times en Google

What does it mean to be conservative in the Trump era? How is that changing? Has the term — and the philosophy behind it — lost all meaning?

Elizabeth Corey, a political scientist at Baylor, is a conservative — though what she sees being called “conservatism” today has left her dismayed.

She explained what she thinks about conservatism’s present, and potential future, in a written conversation with John Guida, an editor in Times Opinion. It has been edited for length and clarity.

John Guida: What is the state of conservatism today, and how confusing has it been to call yourself one in the Trump era?

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Elizabeth Corey: The state of conservatism is quite varied, as anyone who follows politics knows. There are post-liberals, common-good conservatives, national conservatives and so on. One thing I see in all these camps is a certain adversarial posture toward American culture — or toward certain aspects of that culture that they dislike. I sympathize with some of that.

But my own understanding of conservatism is different — it’s grounded in culture and tradition, and in some sense, religion. It’s the idea that we should “conserve” the many goods that we have received from the past: philosophy, art, poetry, music, family life, etc. We can’t have any of these things without a stable political order. But political action is not at the very heart of things.

Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.

Read 8 comments

  • Share full article

  • 8

Related Content

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Site Index

Site Information Navigation

To leave, use your browser's Back button.