DailyGlimpse

Ebola Is a Terrible Disease. I Saw It Firsthand.

Opinion
May 22, 2026 · 1:35 AM
Ebola Is a Terrible Disease. I Saw It Firsthand.

Opinion | Ebola Is a Terrible Disease. I Saw It Firsthand. - The New York Times

Skip to contentSkip to site indexSearch & Section Navigation Section Navigation

Search

Subscribe for $1/weekLog in

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Today’s Paper

Subscribe for $1/week

Opinion|I Survived Ebola. This Is What Scares Me Most About This Outbreak.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/21/opinion/ebola-outbreak-virus-spread-usaid.html

  • Share full article

  • 113

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion

Supported by

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Guest Essay

I Survived Ebola. This Is What Scares Me Most About This Outbreak.

May 21, 2026, 5:00 p.m. ET

Credit...Moses Sawasawa/Associated Press

Audio 1

Listen · 6:10 min

  • Share full article

  • 113

By Craig Spencer

Dr. Spencer is an emergency doctor and a professor at Brown. He contracted Ebola in 2014 after treating patients in Guinea.

See more of our coverage in your search results.Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda.Add The New York Times on Google Agrega The New York Times en Google

As soon as I heard about the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, I knew it was going to be catastrophic.

On Friday, the D.R.C. reported 246 suspected cases. Most Ebola outbreaks end before they get that big. The same day, reports emerged that someone had died of Ebola hundreds of miles away in Kampala, Uganda’s most populous city. Less than a week after it was first declared, this is already the third-largest Ebola outbreak in history.

I’ve seen Ebola up close. I got it while treating patients in West Africa in 2014. I know how destructive the disease can be — and how unprepared we are for its return.

After the 2014 outbreak, which killed over 11,000 people, the world strengthened systems to catch and contain Ebola outbreaks early. Much of that infrastructure — surveillance networks, rapid response teams and diplomatic partnerships — has been dismantled over the past year, as the United States abdicated its longstanding role as a leader in global health and humanitarian response.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Ebola is often called a disease of compassion because it finds its victims among the people who stay close when loved ones or their patients fall ill. This means parents taking care of their sick children, family members who wash the bodies of their dead relatives and health care providers who take care of patients at the most contagious stage of their illness. When I was working in Guinea, I admitted seven members of one family into our Ebola treatment unit. Even as the parents battled Ebola, they spent all day taking care of their children. In the end, only the parents survived.

If the outbreak were caused by the more common Zaire strain of Ebola, we’d now be able to provide a recently developed vaccine to family members of infected patients and to health care workers. But we have no effective treatments or vaccines for the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola driving the current outbreak.

Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.

A version of this article appears in print on May 22, 2026, Section A, Page 22 of the New York edition with the headline: People Will Die of Ebola Because of U.S. Cuts to Global Health. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Read 113 comments

  • Share full article

  • 113

Related Content

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Site Index

Site Information Navigation

To leave without signing in, use your browser's Back button.

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.

See subscription options